Evaluation of Iterative Methods MLEM and OSEM for Bone SPECT Image Reconstruction Employing Monte Carlo Simulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2024.v18.19849001806Keywords:
Bone scintigraphy, SPECT, Monte Carlo, Iterative MethodsAbstract
Bone scintigraphy is one of the main exams recommended for evaluating the skeletal system. In order to identify alterations more accurately, the SPECT technique (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) may be indicated. However, the quality of the SPECT image is dependent on the reconstruction methods and parameters employed. Among the reconstruction methods, the iterative methods, the Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (MLEM) and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) stand out, capable of achieving better spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio. This study aims to evaluate the iterative methods which are MLEM and OSEM for the reconstruction of bone SPECT images, in order to identify optimized reconstruction parameters for each technique. The acquisition of projection images was performed using the Monte Carlo method using SIMIND software for computational simulation of signal acquisition in a gamma camera. Image reconstruction was performed using the MLEM and OSEM methods with different numbers of iterations, with the latter using 2, 4, 8, and 16 subsets. Analysis of the reconstructed images was based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast (C), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between regions of high and low radionuclide uptake. The results show that the OSEM technique provides images with higher contrast and CNR values than MLEM, for a lower number of iterations. In particular, OSEM with 8 and 16 subsets provided the highest CNR values at 6 and 2 iterations, respectively. Increasing the number of iterations beyond these values tends to reduce image quality due to increased noise levels. Overall, the results obtained highlight the importance of optimizing the reconstruction parameters of iterative methods.
Downloads
References
Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, et al. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecu-lar Imaging]. 2016 Jun 4;43(9):1723–38.
Müller V, Steinhagen J, De Wit M, Bohuslavizki K. Introduction Bone scintigraphy in clinical routine. Radiol Oncol. 2001;35(1):21–30.
Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012.
Sarikaya I, Sarikaya A, Holder LE. The role of single photon emission computed tomography in bone imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2001 Jan;31(1):3–16.
Barros PP de, Metello LF, Camozzato TSC, Vieira DM da S. Optimization of OSEM parameters in myocardial perfusion imaging reconstruction as a function of body mass index: a clinical approach. Radiologia Brasileira. 2015 Oct;48(5):305–13.
Bruyant PP. Analytic and iterative reconstruction al-gorithms in SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1343–1358
Seret A. The number of subsets required for OSEM reconstruction in nuclear cardiology. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2005 Nov 12;33(2):231–1.
Ljungberg M, Strand SE. A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1989 Aug;29(4):257-72.
Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Medical Physics. 1994 Feb;21(2):299–302.
Ivón Oramas Polo. Evaluation of the scattered radiation components produced in a gamma camera using Monte Carlo method. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica. 2014 Jun 1;30(2):179–88.
Gustafsson A, Örndahl E, Minarik D, Cederholm K, Frantz S, Hagerman J, et al. A multicentre simulation study of planar whole-body bone scintigraphy in Sweden. EJNMMI Physics. 2022 Feb 14;9(1).
Merlin T, Stute S, Benoit D, Bert J, Carlier T, Comtat C, et al. CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2018 Sep 10;63(18):185005.
Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U.S National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, https://imagej.net/ij/, 1997-2018.
Bruyant PP. Analytic and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2002; 1;43(10):1343–58.
Fukami M, Matsutomo N, Yamamoto T. Optimization of Number of Iterations as a Reconstruction Parameter in Bone SPECT Imaging Using a Novel Thoracic Spine Phantom. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2021; 49(2):143–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wallifer Rodrigues de Lima, Fernando Kleber dos Santos Garcia, Thamye Dias Martins Santos, Diego Merigue da Cunha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of original articles to the Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics implies the transfer, by the authors, of the rights of print and digital publication. Copyright for published articles remains with the author, with journal rights on first publication. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the original publisher. As we are an open access journal, free use of articles in educational, scientific, non-commercial applications is allowed, as long as the source is cited.
The Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics is under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).